On February 18, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released its long-awaited study of forensic science labs.  The study, launched in 2005 at the behest of Congress, found that America's crime labs are underfunded, understaffed, and frequently rely on forensic methods that have not been scientifically verified.

While the study did not review specific cases, it did consider the procedures used in the examination of evidence during thousands of trials.  The study's findings call into question the reliability of non-DNA evidence such as fingerprint and hair analysis.  The NAS found that a lack of national standards in the forensic sciences has severely weakened the accuracy of test results.

The panel, co-chaired by Judge Harry Edwards and Professor Constantine Gatsonsis, recommended that Congress create a National Forensic Science Institute to establish standards, accredit labs and regulate training.  The NAS' findings are not binding, but Congress could move to implement their recommendations.

To read more about the report and its findings, click here.

Technorati Tags:

This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 18th, 2009 at 4:36 pm and is filed under blog, homepage. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.