The primary issues raised in this week's hearing were (1) whether the prosecution covered up information about benefits awarded to snitches who testified against Mr. Hash, and (2) whether detectives declined, for political reasons, to follow up on leads suggesting that someone other than Mr. Hash committed the crime.  The judge ordered the parties to submit written presentations following the hearing.  He expects to make a decision early next year.

To read news coverage of this week's hearing, click here. 

Technorati Tags:

This entry was posted on Friday, October 19th, 2007 at 2:05 pm and is filed under blog, Cases, homepage. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.